President George W Bush's concept of a "war on terror" has given strength to terrorists by making them feel part of something bigger, Hilary Benn has said.The international development secretary told a meeting in New York the phrase gives a shared identity to small groups with widely differing aims.
Mr Benn said: "In the UK, we do not use the phrase 'war on terror' because we can't win by military means alone.
"And because this isn't us against one organised enemy with a clear identity and a coherent set of objectives."
It is "the vast majority of the people in the world" against "a small number of loose, shifting and disparate groups who have relatively little in common", he said.
"What these groups want is to force their individual and narrow values on others, without dialogue, without debate, through violence.
"And by letting them feel part of something bigger, we give them strength."
Comments on past and present political, religious and pop cultural events.
Monday, April 16, 2007
"War on Terrorism" is Strategically Ineffective
My friend Jesse cued me to this link.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Topics
Archive
-
▼
2007
(46)
-
▼
April
(9)
- Practicing criticism is a matter of making facile ...
- Relating to Postmodernism: A Rough Typology of Eva...
- The Challenge of Relativism, or, The Problem Creat...
- What are they saying?
- As tragic as the Virginia Tech shootings are, let’...
- Woody Guthrie and Jesus Christ
- "War on Terrorism" is Strategically Ineffective
- A while back I picked up The Concept of Dread by S...
- Beating Around the Ontological Bush
-
▼
April
(9)
Links
Me
- Jacob
- Konnarock, Virginia via Washington, DC
- Father. Husband. Academic. Avid reader and writer with dreams of returning to the Appalachian mountains.
No comments:
Post a Comment